[SM-Discuss] New archive and perl-cpan maintainer
thomas.houssin at gmail.com
Thu Feb 17 09:12:06 EST 2005
Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> I'm always for smaller sections, so if you can give me a logical
> grouping that splits utils into seperate sections we can do that.
> Utils is one of those 'drop everything in here' sections like libs, so
> splitting it into more useful sections would definitely be nice.
What about creating these two sections : pam and admin-tools (or
something like that). We could have all linux-pam, linux-pam-headers and
pam_* spells in pam ; in admin-tools, things like system-loogers,
(by the way, about pam, there's a lot af pam plugins we could have
spells for, on http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/modules.html or
on freshmeat ;) )
Key ID = 42404C36
Key fingerprint = 3CB8 3FC4 840D B272 E623 BCB8 54DB F4E3 4240 4C36
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20050217/d774479e/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss