[SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO
Eric Sandall
eric at sandall.us
Sun Feb 13 22:22:40 EST 2005
Quoting Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault at sourcemage.org>:
<snip>
> I have no problem with that timing myself, except if someone is waiting
> for an ISO soon. Anyone?
I would like one fairly soon, but can wait for the glibc issue to be fixed.
> By the way, do we thus agree that the proper way to build the ISO is
> using the stable grimoire ONLY? I have no problem using another grimoire
> (like test or devel or whatever) provided it's agreed on (and that it
> allows to build an ISO of course :-)).
stable is preferred as it's "more tested" and "safer".
> I'll test the devel's glibc spell as well and report the success/failure
> in bugzilla.
Thanks. :)
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list