[SM-Discuss] glibc spell status and next ISO

Eric Sandall eric at sandall.us
Sun Feb 13 22:22:40 EST 2005


Quoting Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault at sourcemage.org>:
<snip>
> I have no problem with that timing myself, except if someone is waiting
> for an ISO soon. Anyone?

I would like one fairly soon, but can wait for the glibc issue to be fixed.

> By the way, do we thus agree that the proper way to build the ISO is
> using the stable grimoire ONLY? I have no problem using another grimoire
> (like test or devel or whatever) provided it's agreed on (and that it
> allows to build an ISO of course :-)).

stable is preferred as it's "more tested" and "safer".

> I'll test the devel's glibc spell as well and report the success/failure
> in bugzilla.

Thanks. :)

-sandalle

--
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.



More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list