[SM-Discuss] ISO contrib file
Arwed von Merkatz
v.merkatz at gmx.net
Sat Feb 12 04:58:27 EST 2005
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:37:24PM -0800, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 09:24:10PM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> > Seth Alan Woolley a écrit :
> > >I would add that the GPL FAQ is not legally binding, either, and the
> > >ChangeLog should suffice for what the FSF is getting at.
> > Where do we can seek for a legally binding then? I thought at least that
> > the GPL FAQ would have been the best place to have some guidelines (if
> > it's not legally binding).
> The text of the GPL itself is the legally binding part. Our social
> contract is also legally binding. legal bounds are determined by
> guesswork by lawyers and settled in courts with precedents. The GPL has
> not been fully legally tested in judged court decisions, so we're at
> "guesswork" stage.
In germany it has been confirmed to be fully valid by a court order.
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
More information about the SM-Discuss