[SM-Discuss] GPG keyring storage ?
f.bridault at fra.net
Thu Aug 18 10:46:42 EDT 2005
Now that I become to understand the GPG checking process for spells, I
noticed, if I understood well ;-), that you have to include a keyring in
the spell when using a vendor key. That means, referring to a real
example, that there is a kernel.gpg keyring in the udev spell and the
same kernel.gpg keyring in the linux spell.
Is it not a big problem in the design ? For me, anything redundant is
bad, and as I heard on IRC "Yes we should resolve that later", I rather
like to point out this now, in order to avoid later mass changes of
spells using GPG checking.
If I'm right (that's finally the question), I will obviously post a
Feel free to send me flames if I again said bullshits. ^_^
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
Source Mage GNU/Linux - Disk Section Guru
jabber: vlaaad at amessage.be
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20050818/22c57cdf/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss