[SM-Discuss] Differentiated user/developer/lead cloaks
Jeremy Blosser (emrys)
jblosser-smgl at firinn.org
Wed Aug 17 13:47:39 EDT 2005
On Aug 17, Jason Flatt [jflatt at sourcemage.org] wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 August 2005 09:41 am, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Alex Smith wrote:
> > <snip>
> > >> Given the nature of our distribution as being for independently-minded
> > >> people, is there room to suggest that we standardize the
> > >> herald/elder/apprentice/golem ones, and other devs can choose anything
> > >> they
> > >> want that's "in theme"? Or would that upset freenode?
> > >
> > > Probably upset them. Most distros only have one, or two types at the
> > > most. Whilst keeping this in mind - you don't get if you don't ask :)
> > So they wouldn't like us having golem, apprentice, elder, wizard, and
> > guru (plus whatever replaces mage, if anything)? We'd maybe get two of
> > them?
> > -sandalle
> If only two are allowed, then probably stick with lead and developer,
> whatever titles are finally decided on.
I'm pretty sure gentoo has at least developer, user, and bot. I'd stick
with those if we have a limit (our versions of those, anyway).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20050817/0508e488/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss