dufflebunk at dufflebunk.homeip.net
Mon May 24 12:34:18 EDT 2004
Perhaps the spell could force this as well, so next update everyone will
have the correct permissions?
On Mon, 2004-24-05 at 09:23 -0700, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:31:30AM -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > Quoting Seth Alan Woolley <seth at positivism.org>:
> > > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 04:27:30PM +0200, Vladim?r Marek wrote:
> > > > Was only mine and ruskie's /etc/shadow set to rw-r--r-- permissions, or
> > > > is it widespread SM 'feature' ? :)
> > >
> > > $ ls -l /etc/shadow
> > > -r-------- 1 root root 1992 May 21 15:05 /etc/shadow
> > >
> > > which ISO and version of shadow are you using?
> > Installed from latest ISO (2.6.5 20040414) with shadow 184.108.40.206:
> > $ l /etc/shadow
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.2K 2004-05-14 09:57 /etc/shadow
> root at sourcemage2:~# cat /etc/issue
> Welcome on Source Mage GNU/\s 0.9.1 \l
> root at sourcemage2:~# ls -l /etc/shadow
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 815 Mar 8 16:40 /etc/shadow
> I'm guessing what happened is that the ISO included an /etc/shadow that
> was 644 instead of 400 and it got copied over like that. Perhaps the
> shadow spell never sets permissions if the file already exists. Appears
> to be a problem with Hamish's ISO sets.
> I just edited the ISO installer script to set the perms to 400 after it
> sets the root password. I advise everybody to chmod 400 /etc/shadow on
> all their machines.
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss at lists.ibiblio.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20040524/7f39a4a9/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss