[SM-Discuss] sorcery stuff

Eric Sandall eric at sandall.us
Fri May 14 14:11:16 EDT 2004


Quoting Andrew <afrayedknot at thefrayedknot.armory.com>:
> I have two things to bring up,
> 
> 1) I want to get a new stable sorcery out

I'd like to get  more people to test it first, as I still have problems which
crop up (all of which I've reported when `cleanse` couldn't solve it). Isn't
`cleanse` supposed to be called by Sorcery somewhere so that people's machines
are "safe"? Perhaps a few more conversion tests from the current stable to
devel Sorcery to make sure it'll be a smooth transition.

> 2) I want to make some infrastructure changes to our scm hierarchy

Wow. If there aren't any nays from the rest of the Sorcery Team then this sounds
like a Good Thing (TM).

-sandalle

-- 
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.



More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list