[SM-Discuss] Gettext . . .
Arjan Bouter
a_bouter at ezrs.com
Fri Aug 27 10:55:54 EDT 2004
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:46:59 +0000
Jason Flatt <jason at flattfamily.com> wrote:
> As an excercise for my own personal amusement and system requirement, I have
> been working on trying to make gettext an optional dependency in the
> grimoires, but I have reached a stopping point for me. I was able to modify
> several spells and get the packages to compile and work (AFAICT) correctly
> w/o gettext. My stopping points are at glib2 and orbit and pretty much
> anything depending them.
>
> I do currently have a fairly functional system w/xorg and several window
> managers (including AfterStep and WindowMaker) installed and running. It
> seems, however, that any GTK+ or GTK+2 based app (anything GNOME or
> Enlightenment, for example) will need to have gettext installed. For anyone
> who has a CLI only system or a minimal windowing system and who is not
> interested in having gettext on their system, it is possible. Also, our
> basesystem does not /need/ gettext.
>
> I haven't ventured into the Qt/KDE area to see how possible it would be to
> have a gettext free system
>
> My question at this point is, is this anything anyone is interested in? I
> know we frequenlty quote the "Coice is good" creedo, but if no one is really
> interested in this particular choice, then I won't bother with submitting
> updated spells, nor continuing to see if there is anything else that may
> optionally depend on gettext.
>
As I often use a laptop (where hd space is limited), every spell I can go
without is welcome. The question is, do we gain much space by not using gettext?
Is there a speed increase? Any other advantages?
Arjan Bouter
(abouter)
>
> --
> Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
> Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
> Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
> IRC Nick: Oadae Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug Server: irc.freenode.net
>
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GCS/IT d(-) s+:- a>++++ C++$(+++) UL++++ P(+) L+++ E- W++ N+@ o? K? w-- O?
> M-- V PS- PE+ Y+ PGP@ t 5+ X R tv--() b+@ DI+@ D+++ G e h---- r+++ y++++
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
--
+=======
Proud Source Mage GNU/Linux user,
Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic.
http://www.sourcemage.org
Registered as user #310617 with the Linux Counter,
http://counter.li.org.
+===
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20040827/3fe82e76/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss
mailing list