[SM-Discuss] Fwd: New Thread: Time to cap grimoires?
hgr at vabo.cz
Tue Jun 24 16:34:14 EDT 2003
> 1) Dependencies across grimoires
Why more splitting ?
I think to have z-rejected separated is sufficient.
Of course we can have core-grimoire, server-grimoire, x11-grimoire,
gnome-grimoire, kde-grimoire but it causes only a lot of problems.
It was be more useful if we could download grimoire by rsync, cvs or p4.
BTW, what is with codex.sourcemage.org ?
It offers only very old grimoires. :-((
I agree. It will not as confusing as now it is.
For example we have http section in every grimoires. It was be better to have
games-http and z-rejected-http sections.
> z-rejected/z-<section> (It'd become greatly tedious to type
BTW, why z-rejected, why not only "rejected" ?
Is it planned to have z-rejected-devel, z-rejected-test and z-rejected-stable,
games ditto ?
Changes in grimoire should be mentioned on wiki because users usually do not
read mailing lists.
I modified http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=Codex a little.
- lace -
More information about the SM-Discuss