[SM-Discuss] NPTL

Eric Sandall eric at sandall.us
Sat Jun 14 23:16:50 EDT 2003


Sergey A. Lipnevich said:
> Hi All!
>
> RH9 has this NPTL thing (http://freshmeat.net/projects/nptl/), do we
> want/need it? Sounds good but I know there're compatibility issues, right?
> Thanks!
>
> Sergey.

Excerpt from
https://listman.redhat.com/archives/phil-list/2003-June/msg00021.html:
---
> Mario Fetka wrote:
> > at the moment i am compiling a compleat Linux from scratch (LFS)
> > but stuck at glibc (cvs 20030611) with nptl
> > but same glibc with linuxthreads compiles with no problems
> > buld env gcc 3.3.1 (cvs 20030602)
>
> Get a kernel which actually can handle nptl.  It is not possible to
> compile glibc without such a kernel unless you cross compile (which
> isn't support officially).

kernel is 2.5.69-ac1 (Kernel headers)

building in a chroot env on redhat 9.0 (2.4.20-8)
---

Looks like NPTL will only work with the 2.5 kernels.

-sandalle

-- 
PGP Key Fingerprint:  FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91  FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61

Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric at sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/



More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list