[SM-Discuss] New Spells...
Geoffrey.Derber at Trinity.edu
Tue Jan 14 10:36:06 EST 2003
Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> why not mark them as severity="enhancement" type and exclude from
> counting queries?
I agree with this. I remember that over the summer, quite a few new
spells that were sent to spell submit were never added, and were lost in
the mounds of emails received. By adding the new spell as a bug, they
are far less likely to be lost. I personally for my section would
rather have a new spell sent to me as a bug "enhancement" than the
> Eric Schabell wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> Howdy all!
>> I have closed out all the bugzilla entries for New Spells (marked
>> invalid) as they belong on the sm-spell-submit lists and no where
>> else... as we work towards 1.0 I would like to have accurate bug
>> counts from bugzilla.
>> If there becomes a need for bugzilla as new spell tool, then let me
>> know and we can set it up with it's own product (catagory) and close
>> out the submit lists...
More information about the SM-Discuss