[SM-Discuss] New Spells...

Geoffrey Derber Geoffrey.Derber at Trinity.edu
Tue Jan 14 10:36:06 EST 2003


Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> why not mark them as severity="enhancement" type and exclude from 
> counting queries?

I agree with this.  I remember that over the summer, quite a few new 
spells that were sent to spell submit were never added, and were lost in 
the mounds of emails received.  By adding the new spell as a bug, they 
are far less likely to be lost.  I personally for my section would 
rather have a new spell sent to me as a bug "enhancement" than the 
submit list.

Geoff
> 
> Eric Schabell wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Howdy all!
>>
>> I have closed out all the bugzilla entries for New Spells (marked 
>> invalid) as they belong on the sm-spell-submit lists and no where 
>> else... as we work towards 1.0 I would like to have accurate bug 
>> counts from bugzilla.
>>
>> If there becomes a need for bugzilla as new spell tool, then let me 
>> know and we can set it up with it's own product (catagory) and close 
>> out the submit lists...
>>
>> Thanks!




More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list