[SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?
rabrams at sourcemage.org
Sat Oct 26 19:13:15 EDT 2002
Sure it matters, Steve. You are the security officer. This is you
getting credit for doing your job so well it was fixed before most
people even noticed the problem.
Congratulations. Keep it up. :)
And thanks! :)
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 07:07 PM, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Sorry Steve, I just remember an 's' in the name, and I was talking to
> a lot. :)
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SECURITY: kerberos vulnerable?
> From: Steven Pinkham <sepinkham at attbi.com>
> Date: Sat, October 26, 2002 15:56
> To: Eric Sandall <eric at sandall.us>
> It was I. Not that it matters...
> Steve Pinkham
> * Eric Sandall <eric at sandall.us> [2002-10-26 18:16]:
>> Wasn't it you who told me about it on IRC? I thought it was you. If
>> not, will whomever did tell me, I'll change my story, honest. ;)
>> -One of Four
> PGP Key 0x5C8D199A5A317214
> Fingerprint=14C0 C194 163E 57CB 0F1B ED87 5C8D 199A 5A31 7214
> Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux
> eric at sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org
> http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> http://counter.li.org #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
More information about the SM-Discuss