[SM-Discuss] Smallest Source Mage
dufflebunk at dufflebunk.homeip.net
Mon Jul 29 21:56:45 EDT 2002
unhun, ok, well then, now that we've all vented and given our opinions
and observations and mulled over whatever numbers we want to toss in and
consider, I will declare this thread terminated. Well, at least
terminated as far as I'm concerened... I'm adding a filter on my
computer to dump any further rantings on this thread to the trash. I
would suggest that if you boys want to continue, you do it privatly
because I'm tired of this discussion, and I'm pretty slow at these
things. So I'm pretty sure most everyone else is too.
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 21:51, Andrew Stitt wrote:
> first off Im not trying to portray you as a firebrand who's flaming
> away for the fun of it, a cursory review of yam and other fora will
> prove that quite nicely. What i was saying was, Im tired of reading the
> same post, which is essentially what you are writing, over and over
> and over again. You've established your point, you've argued it into
> the ground several times. Its also worth noting i never said you werent
> being logical or argumentative in your last post, i was stating that I,
> and probably everyone else reading this is done with this issue, we've
> resolved to 1) put the option in the sorcery, 2) put it in the iso. Now
> you want it to be the default option. Whats it going to be next? if
> you really feel that strongly about it, put it in bugzilla. You need to
> realize that sometimes there are two valid points of view on some things,
> sure if you are strongly for one side the other seems stupid, wrong,
> crazy even, but oh well, you arent going to win them all. If you look
> back through the discussion of this, as well as other arguments you've
> been involved in over the past year this trend is obvious, you've even
> pointed this out to our favorite person, rick moen, sorry to say you're
> starting to look like him always needing the last word on everything,
> and wanting everyone to see it your way and your way only.
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 06:30:55PM -0700, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ wrote:
> > Ahhh, here was the source of the initial offending comment:
> > "Julian v. Bock said:
> > > If tmpfs stays the default it is ok IMO."
> > To which I replied:
> > "Why not be a bit more fair than that and when the better choice is
> > determined, then that will be the default."
> > That sounds pretty balanced and unargumentative to me. In fact, it
> > even seems logical to me. Unfortunately, Eric didn't. So I responded
> > to his response. That hardly qualifies a waste of time in my mind.
> > Now I know you'd like to portray me as a firebrand who's flaming away
> > for the fun of it, but kindly remember that it takes two to tango
> > before making accusations. A look through past messages helps too.
> > -Phil/CERisE
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss at lists.ibiblio.org
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
PGP public key at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20020729/236bfd70/attachment.bin
More information about the SM-Discuss