[SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 78742 by Flavien Bridault for review

Andraž "ruskie" Levstik ruskie at mages.ath.cx
Mon May 1 11:22:35 EDT 2006


Ladislav Hagara wrote :
> Any reason to change SOURCE_HASH to SOURCE_GPG?
> Is it necessary to mention it in HISTORY?
> 
> Sorry for nitpicking, just testing sm-commit list. :-)
> 

Really no reason to move one from the other... we have both as
interchangable... UNLESS there is upstream GPG in which case that
has to be used over any other...

-- 
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker

Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html

Key id = A7A9E461
Key fingerprint = 757E C16B F5B7 DC27 B003  CCED CF95 3A77 A7A9 E461




More information about the SM-Commit mailing list