[permaculture] Joules Ain't Joules ( energy/ethanol)
Toby Hemenway
toby at patternliteracy.com
Mon Sep 3 14:53:11 EDT 2007
Laurence Gaffney wrote:
>
> "amount of total solar energy hitting the Earth is meaningless"
>
> I am not exactly sure what you mean here Toby but I don't think it is meaningless.
Sorry; careless writing. I meant that if all life on the planet can
capture only 0.05% of solar input hitting the Earth, we shouldn't get
too excited about how big that total input number is (see below for
why). It would be a mistake to say, "wow, there's so much energy out
there--we'll never run out!"
And you're right, Laurance. Odum's energy quality idea is very useful
here. The 1/170,000 yield for solar electricity is quite revealing.
> Question:- How does the current Solar Emergy consumption of humans in the USA per annum compare with the annual input of Solar Energy over its Land Mass/Boundaries?.
Thanks, Nathan, for doing the quick calculation. To follow Laurance's
"Joules ain't joules" argument, you then need to multiply by some
enormous factor to account for quality of energy. In other words, if all
the energy used by the US were derived via solar conversion to
electricity, the 0.4333% (US energy use/solar input) would be multiplied
by 170,000, the conversion inefficiency factor for solar electric. That
comes out to 735%.
Thus the US uses 735%, or 7-fold, more usable energy each year than
falls on the entire country as solar energy. Bingo. That should suggest
the nature of our problem. Energy conversion is the killer.
> PS:- What is the source of your figures Nathan?
The numbers Nathan used seemed to have been taken from Wikipedia, as
they have that exact list at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_powe
Toby
http://patternliteracy.com
>
More information about the permaculture
mailing list