CtopherP at aol.com
CtopherP at aol.com
Fri Jul 9 16:25:43 EDT 1999
In a message dated 7/9/99 10:25:47 AM, you wrote:
<<John Schinnerer wrote:
>>So who's mis-managing, and why?
A recent report on climate modeling suggested that African
Desert expansion is due to many external factors and local
activity is a very small part of the problem. Mostly it is
due to climate change and a global view might be most useful.
If this is true then one thing we can do is improve our local
ecology and change our agricultural systems/industrial
I don't think this suggests we should ignore immediate problems
in Africa, just that our local activities may be more connected
to Africa than we expect. The problem could be "us".>>
I would challenge the findings of these kinds of reports. Allan Savory, in
the video I mentioned earlier, takes on this point of blaming world
desertification on climate change. He gives the example of southern africa
where there were many dutch towns with names like Springbockfontain, etc.
Basically the name of an animal and the word fountain. There were springs all
over the landscape, huge native grasses, and tons of game too. In 200 or so
years now there's almost no grass, very little game, and no springs:
desertification. And there's clear rainfall data; it rains just as little and
just as sporadically as 200 years ago.
In that publication of the Soil Conservation Service from 50 years ago called
something like "Soil and Civilization over 7000 Years," (I assume someone
will give the correct source and name of the author here since I can't seem
to remember it) the author travels to the middle east and looks at land
degradation that has happened on a massive scale. In one event in Jordan he's
talking with a herder who is telling about when he was a kid he would stand
on the ridge that they are sitting on and he couldn't see the animals below
because of the grass. Now it's all barren. The author asks why and the herder
says that it just doesn't rain the way it used to. But when he checks the
rainfall data, which this place has for a considerable history, the rainfall
hasn't changed one bit.
What's important is the effectiveness of rainfall. I saw this with painful
clarity in my last 12 years in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Most of the rain that
fell was simply unavailable to plants, either because it ran off, was
evaporated or for various other reasons. So plants are living on 3-4 inches
of rainfall a year at best, not 12 in an average year.
So, the core of my challenge is that climate change may be a factor (and may
be even more of a factor in the future) but if the top inch of soil is unable
to absorb moisture, it doesn't matter how nicely it rains, it's ineffective.
Just my $.02 worth,
Santa Fe, New Mexico USA
More information about the permaculture