[pbs] pbs Digest, Vol 56, Issue 14
JamieV.
jamievande at freenet.de
Wed Sep 12 16:22:01 EDT 2007
Adam, et al,
although I agree this is not really off-topic, as it concerns the
traffic in ornamental plants, which is definitely what we are involved
in, but to believe that these new regulations are to protect us from
terrorist or genetic plots is pretty naive! If one were to actually
create some form of pathogen that could be easily transmitted via plants
or seeds, getting to the appropriate point of distribution would never
be a big problem. The current security measures would never be able to
stop a well thought out plan. Let's be realistic! We shouldn't let
media propoganda mislead us.
The current situation is much more to do with control of all transaction
between otherwise free peoples and control as much of their daily
intercourse as possible, end of subject. (or is it? Who is benefiting
from these controls?. Not you and me) The unfortunate fact that phytos
for small shipments have become an issue is simply fall-out of political
correctness and is of little value in actually monitoring the
import-export of possible pathogens. Inspecting huge shipments of
organic goods has a valid point, but inspecting small shipments of
garden plants/seeds is nothing short of nonsense. Now, this knowledge
doesn't help any of us obtain the objects of our desire, but it should
make it clear that the issue is much larger than control of a few stray
seeds! What we are seeing is a world wide tightening of controls, which
does effect our personal liberties. That the American people have
allowed their govt. to interfere in their personal lives in the name of
national security leaves the rest of the free world in absolute
disbelief. One would think people would read between the lines and see
the issue for what it actually is. Loss of freedom. Usurping personal
and human rights. Unfortunately, this madness has spread well beyond
the American borders. We are all effected.
I don't want to do a soap-box, but I have. You want to have the right
to import plants without undue restriction, then write hard core letters
to your politicians and tell them the current situation is
unacceptable! Don't let yourselves be whitewashed into believing this
is in the name of national security. After all, those Monarch
Butterflies were not murdered by terrorists, they were murdered by
researchers that didn't have it all figured out. An unfortunate
mistake, but not a terrorist attack. Such 'accidents' happen world
wide, it is certainly not only the US, but the connection to gardeners
like you and I simply does not exist!
I expect to receive some hate mail after this, especially considering
the day we have, but the point of my posting is that the situation is
already out of hand. If we do not all react and attempt to regain
control over our personal rights, we won't be able to raise anything in
our gardens, except the local weeds! And that only with permission.
Ciao,
Jamie V.
Cologne
Adam Fikso schrieb:
> Considering the importance of the phytosanitary issue , and the likelihood
> of it continuing--why don't we start considering phytosanitary issues and
> delays as being "on-topic"?. Apparently there is a new set of standards
> being considered for international uniformity which derives its concerns not
> only from terrorist concerns, but from anxiety and concern about
> genetically engineered seeds and plants, which might be used as vehicles for
> terrorist goals. being issued by the Secretariat of the International Plant
> Proection Convention , Food and Agriculture Organizationn of the U.N..
> Jacques Diouf, Director-General.
>
> For example, there is current research on transgenic corn which would
> carry a gene to protect against E.coli just as a result of eating it, and
> another line of research which would protect against HIV infection. (Chicago
> Tribune Magazine Section, September 9, 2007) . Most of you are probably
> already aware of the transgenic corn pollen which destroyed thousands of
> Monarch Butterflies.
>
>
> Given this, what is to keep a bio-terrorist from using similar methods to
> infect or destroy a population of people? Without answering the questions
> implied here, the issue of how one guards against this bio-terrorist
> eventuality by developing and writing regulations for the inspection and
> transport of seed between countries becomes an enormous task. Relevant
> questions for governments are: What kind of inspection is even possible?
> What kinds of quarantines are facing us in the future?
>
> I think that much of the present concern we're seeing is motivated in part
> by some of the above issues. So, growing decorative plants from seed from
> other places may become much more restrictive in the near future, and
> perhaps for a long time.
>
>
More information about the pbs
mailing list