[NAFEX] only slightly off topic: roses
Docshiva at Docshiva.org
Thu Jun 14 22:01:25 EDT 2007
Roses are grown for their hips, so I think you're on topic... suckers coming
from below my rose grafts have been red, double, and thorny.
Sorry you were disappointed with the scent - I had scent-rose feature in a
garden, it was very, very pleasant, especially early in the am.
And big rugosas for the hips, but elsewhere on the property. You know, I'm
slowly planting out our new place, and hadn't thought of roses! I had
dozens before, scattered here and there, many kinds, mostly blending into
the landscape; they just looked homey. We have several flowering vines, and
I've grown many over the years, but nothing looked so right as a climbing
rose over the front gate...
From: nafex-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:nafex-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Ginda Fisher
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:22 PM
To: North American Fruit Explorers
Subject: [NAFEX] off topic: roses
Well, as long as the topic of roses has come up. . . I have a rose
bush my uncle gave me. He got it at a local nursery, where it was
labeled as coming from Jacksons and Perkins. It was a "scentsation",
which has red & white striped blossoms with a pleasant scent. The
first year I planted it we had an unusually cold winter, and I
thought it died. It has slowly come back, and I can't tell whether
it has grown back from above or below the graft. This year it has
bloomed - a red blossom, with about the same form as "scentsation".
I don't notice much scent, but was disappointed with the scent of the
plant before it died back, too.
The blossom certainly looks like it could have been intentionally
selected - it's not a wild rose by any means. But it doesn't look
like it's supposed to. Could I have a bud mutation (losing the
stripes) from the cold? Does J&P use a red-blossomed rose for its
Nothing in particular rides on the answer, but I'm curious.
More information about the nafex