[NAFEX] GM plants, corn , court cases
Teghtmeyer, Suzanne R
srt175f at smsu.edu
Fri Feb 13 14:30:56 EST 2004
This will link you to the Canadian Court of Appeals ruling made against
Percy Schmeiser forcing him to pay up to Monsanto.
From: nafex-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:nafex-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Peter Knop
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 11:48 AM
To: nafex at lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [NAFEX] GM plants, corn , court cases
1.) Can anyone give me the citation for a court case where Monsanto (or
others) won on the "ownership" issue of drifted pollen?
2) Of course all corns we eat today are genetically modified if one
to be technical about it - hybridising modifies the genetics. Inserting
mechanical or chemical means new genes is what I guess I would define GM
plants to be - does someone else have a better definition I could use?
I was growing supersweets 20 years ago as well as the old standbys
results of hybridisation, but not GM or at least it was not called that
the time...... And a REAL bummer was that if one was not very careful
the supersweets they turned out not very sweet if pollen from anther
nailed them before their own.....or so we were told and so it seemed
is a funny thing, like the placebo effect, one's mind can make strange
things happen :-)) Never heard of any court cases on ruining the
nafex mailing list
nafex at lists.ibiblio.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe, go to the bottom of this page (also can be
used to change other email options):
File attachments are NOT stripped by this list
TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM COMPUTER VIRUSES!
Please do not send binary files.
Use plain text ONLY in emails!
Message archives are here:
NAFEX web site: http://www.nafex.org/
More information about the nafex