[internetworkers] spam filter
schampeo at hesketh.com
Thu Aug 4 15:39:56 EDT 2005
on Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 02:56:09PM -0400, Michael Best wrote:
> > It didn't contain the same links, though, did it? I trimmed out
> > the footer,
> > which I've left in this one:
> Well to test, I took the original message that was flagged as spam and put
> it back through. This time it wasn't marked as spam. So I guess it was
> fixed as quickly as it was broken.
Or it was an intermittent bug in SpamAssassin (that's what causes a lot
of the false positives SURBL sees, anyway). YMMV.
> > > ---
> > BTW, this should probably be "-- \n", not "---\n", if the intent is to
> > signify a .signature. :)
> This is added by the mailing list software as part of its signiture.
Sure, but the Good Netkeeping Seal suggests "-- \n" as the separator.
The list software apparently doesn't understand that. <shrug>
hesketh.com/inc. v: +1(919)834-2552 f: +1(919)834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com
antispam news, solutions for sendmail, exim, postfix: http://enemieslist.com/
More information about the InterNetWorkers