[internetworkers] Intellectual Rights Kills Anti-Spam Measure
shea at sheatisdale.com
Mon Sep 27 17:19:58 EDT 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:internetworkers-
> bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Alan MacHett
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 4:04 PM
> To: internetworkers at lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: [internetworkers] Intellectual Rights Kills Anti-Spam Measure
> > Anti-Spam Effort Killed Amid Patent Row
> > By ANICK JESDANUN, AP Internet Writer
> > NEW YORK - A row over intellectual property claims from Microsoft Corp.
> > has dealt a fatal blow to an ambitious effort by Internet engineers to
> > create a technical standard for curbing junk e-mail.
> > The failure to reach consensus on the Microsoft-championed proposal
> > known as Sender ID throws back to the free market a process many
> > consider urgent in view of the unabating onslaught of spam.
> Sender ID? Is that the same as challenge-response? I forget what the
> general consensus was on INW about this measure; I'm sure Champeon would
> have a thing or two to say, were he present.
I'm over simplifying, but it really doesn't matter. This was a proposal
whereby all mail server operators would register their servers for an ID.
This ID would effectively prevent spoofing or so they say.
Microsoft began taking signups a while back and one of the largest groups to
sign up were known spammers...so much for that working.
> Too bad. We might be able to fix the Internet if everyone weren't so busy
> trying to own it.
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
More information about the InterNetWorkers