[internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres
Edward Wesolowski
edwes at idisplay.com
Thu Feb 12 12:57:28 EST 2004
Thomas:
A workaround could be to change your registration (I expect that's "easy"
and then you could change it back after the election. I'm a registered
"Independent" myself, so I've got the same "challenge."
But, then again,
>I don't see why anyone not affiliating themselves with a political party
should be allowed to vote in that party's >primary. The point of a primary
is to select /your/ party's candidate for office. What do you think a
party is for?
What Diana said!-)
Oh, and
> Haud your wheesht...,:)
What the heck does that mean, anyway? No, on second thought, I'm probably
not old enough to know;-)
Ed Wesolowski
At 12:40 PM 2/12/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>On Thursday, Feb 12, 2004, at 00:55 US/Eastern, Tanner Lovelace wrote:
>
>>Thomas Beckett wrote:
>>
>>>The never-ending redistricting litigation has put the very basis of the
>>>elections in to question, so the state Board of Election put off the
>>>state primary elections until July. That is far too late for any
>>>meaningful participation in the presidential selection process, so the
>>>state party is implementing a contingency plan for electing delegates in
>>>lieu of the established primary election. You must be a registered
>>>Democrat to participate.
>>
>>So, who do I complain about for the fact that all of us who refuse to
>>affiliate with a political party are now effectively disenfranchised?
>>I was planning on voting in the democratic primary (because there
>>really isn't a republican primary this year) to hopefully influence in
>>some micro-miniscule way the election but now I just have to accept
>>what's given to me in the November election?!? What's the point
>>of having laws that say independents can vote in primaries then?
>>The question is, who's fault it it? The republicans for the damn
>>lawsuit or the democrats for moving things around. <sarcasm>Perhaps
>>I should just sue them all</sarscasm>. Nah, better to vote them
>>all out of office...
>>
>>Tanner
>
>I don't see why anyone not affiliating themselves with a political party
>should be allowed to vote in that party's primary. The point of a primary
>is to select /your/ party's candidate for office. What do you think a
>party is for? It's a club of like-minded voters (roughly) and if you are
>not a member, then you don't get to play. What laws say independents can
>vote in primaries? Is this some crazy North Carolina thing? In Ohio, you
>must be registered as a member of the party to vote in that party's
>primary. Haud your wheesht, Tanner. :)
>
>Diana
>
>---
>Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web
>site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
>You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
>To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
More information about the InterNetWorkers
mailing list