[Icommons] New partners = changes in policy?
Jamison Young
jam at iarts.cc
Fri Feb 15 09:51:45 EST 2008
Heather writes:
> The latter is what we've chosen. It is in line with our principles of
> diversity and conversation on building a world where we can agree on
> the many diverse understandings of what constitutes a free culture.
I get the impression that Heather is not interested in ideas that
don't fit
in with what's going for her. Part of the problem with the forum that
was created, was that iCommons had already made the decision about
what they were going to do prior to the forum. Even in Heather's
response
she talks about the policy we have chosen, yet the board has not
voted yet
on the policy. Paul J told me the board was going to vote/look on the
issue.
Now the policy is and no-one can do anything. Icommons have a
community of 850 people that have registered, why not send out a mail
with some questions?
CC name has been used to form this community, as the community grows
the resource of those that created that community is used to move in
another
direction. Organizations that maybe don't have a similar philosophy
can say they
are part of the commons. What meaning is left ?
Putting ideas in a closet under the stairs is not the way.
I have to get back to my tunes.
Regards,
Jamison
More information about the Icommons
mailing list