lurine at com-pair.net
Tue Dec 15 17:33:17 EST 2009
Leslie, I was talking about the documents/data you use for the projects the
grants are written for/about. All grants require that you keep "x"
documents for "y" years. Well, 99.9% of all Federal grants do. Some of the
private money I got didn't really care. Here's the money, send us a copy of
the results. End of discussion.
The last one I wrote, last year, was for funding a genome project. It
covers 5 years and all supporting documentation must be maintained for a
minimum of 10 years after the close of the grant and final audit.
--"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we
are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and
servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." Theordore
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leslie" <cayadopi at yahoo.com>
> There's a big difference between keeping papers for writing grants for a
> school etc.......... and keeping papers that would CYA on saying the world
> is warming in a cataclismic manner that will threaten the very existance
> of life. :-)
> 'Course maybe they didn't know the world puppet masters would seize on
> their report for another means.... but then what's the deal with the
> hacked emails?
> "Several of the e-mails were allegedly written by Phil Jones, head of the
> Climate Research Unit. One, dated November 16, 1999, contained a sentence
> about temperatures and referred to a “trick” that could be used to “hide
> the decline”. "
> The would have been much smarter in deleting potentially incriminating
> emails that their source documents for their conclusions.... LOL.
> Can't help but wonder..... what does "hide the decline" mean? Decline in
> global warming? Stay tuned, more on climate-gate will undoubtably be
More information about the Homestead