[Homestead] Another take on F&F
DSanner106 at aol.com
DSanner106 at aol.com
Mon Sep 8 11:25:50 EDT 2008
So you would rather just give them the money with no possibility of
recovery???? I would rather have
some hope anyway. Look at previous govt. bailouts, like Chrysler many years
ago. The stock was around 2.00 a share, and after recovery was at 32.00 a
share. Had the Govt. taken stock for their cash infusion, we would not have lost
a cent and would have made money while saving a bunch of jobs in the
process. This seems like a much better idea. .
D
In a message dated 9/8/2008 11:18:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
lisakvperry at gmail.com writes:
> > >They will have stock they can sell and recover the investment from
> later.
>
> They have stock that borders on worthless that they can pretend they can
> sell
> later. If the stock had been worth anything, there would have been no need
> for the take over.
**************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog,
plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com.
(http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)
More information about the Homestead
mailing list