[Homestead] An article cheering the Supremes

Rob becida at comcast.net
Wed Jul 6 20:43:25 EDT 2005


At  7/6/2005 07:45 AM, you wrote:

> >While the SC is indeed the last word, the scope of that last word is 
> strictly
> >prescribed.  The current SC has stepped beyond that.  And I agree with
> >Melody that they are the enemy of the Constitution.
>
>The Constitution gives the Supreme Court the final say, whether anyone
>likes it or not.

True, they decide (if they want to) if what was done is legal under the 
Constitution.

>  Nothing short of wholesale, violent revolution will change
>that.

Not true. The Congress, the Executive branch and the Supreme Court are the 
THREE parts that form our fed govt. Anyone of them can be overruled by the 
others.
The Constitution CAN be changed through an amendment or by holding another 
Constitutional Convention.
I'd stay a long ways away from a convention, we'd be a lot easier to manage 
without that pesky "bill of rights"and I'll bet that would be the first to 
go at a convention.
It sounds silly but maybe we need an amendment that calls for bringing back 
the Tenth amendment?

>All this arguing about the Constitution is moot. The Supreme Court IS
>the law. And it has become predictably, lamentably partisan.

"It has become"... sad but true.
Wasn't it on this list some years back where some talked of serving SC 
members (in a restaurant) while they were having a meal with established 
lobbyists?
Fixing this in 'todays' world is going to be a tough nut to crack.



Rob
becida at comcast.net 




More information about the Homestead mailing list