[Homestead] second stolen election :
sgian at planetc.com
Wed Nov 24 09:59:00 EST 2004
> O.K., why do folks do this. They are going along and even if I don't
> the arguments are nice and logical and clear as to their point. Then they
> throw in the illogic or the stereotype broadbrushing - "mindless Bush
For this reason, Lynda: The question has been posited: What would the
election look like, what would the results be where George Bush WINS and yet
he did not steal the election? It's a fair question.
So far we've only been offered the scenario that if ALL the allegations
about irregularities were true when they lowered Bush's count, and none
whatever would even be entertained against Kerry, then maybe Kerry would
have won by a dozen votes rather than Bush winning by tens or hundreds of
thousands. That is, one side.
Things like that have gone on in every election on both sides. So the
question is still before us: what would the election results have to have
been for even you supreme leftists to say "Oh, we just lost. The voters of
the country don't agree with our vision and direction for the country."
Did you ever see the flick "Robocop", the first one. Murphy's first mission
was where the incumbent mayor had just lost the election and he was holding
people hostage and in order to stall for time they asked him what his
demands were. He said "I want there to be a recount, and if I don't win, I
want there to be an new election. And I want to be declared mayor no matter
what the results are."
So far that's what the 'stolen election' blather sounds like and not much
more. And that's why it's mindless.
More information about the Homestead