[freetds] Getting stored procedure output parametersandreturnvalues
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT
Frediano.Ziglio at vodafone.com
Thu Apr 12 09:39:51 EDT 2007
>
> Thank you very much Frediano.
> I really would be thankful if you could send me this test.
> ...
>
There were a very similar test in funccall.
Now I even imported your test (which work flawlessly), see
http://freetds.cvs.sourceforge.net/freetds/freetds/src/odbc/unittests/funccall.c?revision=1.14&view=markup
freddy77
>
> "ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT" <Frediano.Ziglio at vodafone.com> escreveu:
> >
> > Hi Frediano, thank's for your help.
> >
> > But problem continues. In odbc32 from Microsoft, I do this.
> > It realy works.
> > But in unixODBC don't.
> >
> > My SP do not return record sets or rows affected, simply
> > set an output parameter.
> >
> > See:
> >
> > create procedure sp_test
> > @res int output
> > as
> > set @res = 456
> >
>
> This should be related to how tokens are readed.. ms odbc
> usually handle
> more tokens so it catches parameters earlier. Current CVS (I don't
> remember 0.64) should handle tokens quite accurately. I'll do a check,
> perhaps there's already a test for this problem.
>
> freddy77
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
>
>
>
> Atenciosamente,
> João M L Amaral
> __________________________________________________
> Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
> http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
>
>
More information about the FreeTDS
mailing list