[freetds] 0.64 status and coverage

Kall, Bruce A. kall at mayo.edu
Thu Jul 7 10:22:18 EDT 2005


Greetings,

Just wondering if the problem described in my previous email is fixed in 
0.64?

Thanks,
Bruce

 >From: Thompson, Bill D (London)
 >> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:34 AM
 >>
 >> Bruce,
 >>
 >
 >>> > Is this true?
 >
 >>
 >> No. Not as far as I know.


Au contraire, mon ami.  I'm afraid it is.

ISTR buffering has been broken for a while.  I just updated
src/dblib/unittests/t0002.c to demonstrate.  If the test is broken,
please say how.

Right now, dbclrbuf() fails an assertion if there are no rows buffered.
It shouldn't.  But if you move dbclrbuf() after the dbnextrow() loop,
you just get a different kind of error:

	Failed.  Expected i to be 11, was 10

Unfortunately, the buffering logic is a bear.

--jkl


 >> -----Original Message-----
 >> From: Kall, Bruce A.
 >> Sent: 13 April 2005 15:26
 >>
 >> Is this true?
 >>
 >
 >>> > Apparently FreeTDS has issues with stored procs that return more

than

 >> one result set.
 >>
 >> I appear to be having this problem as a stored procedure returning

more

 >> than one result set results in the following error:
 >>
 >
 >>> > dblib.c:303: buffer_add_row: Assertion `row_size <=

buf->element_size'

 >> failed.
 >>
 >> Executing Sybase stored procedures that one return one result set run
 >> just fine.  I'm running it through php and freetds 0.62.  I've tried
 >> early versions of 0.63 to no avail.



More information about the FreeTDS mailing list