[freetds] Further complications in compiling latest snapshot
Brian Bruns
brian.bruns at gmail.com
Wed Dec 15 14:13:58 EST 2004
We'll I thought it was fairly straight forward, but I used signal() to
ignore SIGPIPE, but I still segfaulted on a SIGPIPE. I think I'll
have to look into it a bit more. I'd guess it was a bug in my stuff,
but the code is bone simple.
BTW, the new code will make it possible to support TDS7/8 with a
minimal amount of work.
Brian
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:07:22 -0500, Lowden, James K
<LowdenJK at bernstein.com> wrote:
> > From: Brian Bruns
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 9:34 AM
> >
> > Anybody know the portable way to do this? I was getting SIGPIPE on
> > dead sockets and using signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN) to ignore it wasn't
> > working on my Linux box.
> >
> > I suppose we could use autoconf to detect it and fall back to the old
> > (broken) method.
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_04.ht
> ml
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/signal.html
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xns/send.html
>
> What's broken, exactly? I don't see what's "old" or "broken" about
> signal(3). How is it being superseded?
>
> The standard says send() signals SIGPIPE on EPIPE, and (implicitly) that
> signal() may be used to ignore SIGPIPE. AIUI, that's expected to work
> in all implementations. Is it known not to work in Linux?
>
> I see the preprocessor conditionals in net.c, but it's not clear to me
> what published behavior it's aimed at.
>
> --jkl
>
> -----------------------------------------
> The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Please note that we do not accept account orders and/or instructions by e-mail, and therefore will not be responsible for carrying out such orders and/or instructions.
> If you, as the intended recipient of this message, the purpose of which is to inform and update our clients, prospects and consultants of developments relating to our services and products, would not like to receive further e-mail correspondence from the sender, please "reply" to the sender indicating your wishes. In the U.S.: 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10105.
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
>
More information about the FreeTDS
mailing list