[freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 1

Thompbil18 at aol.com Thompbil18 at aol.com
Mon Nov 29 17:10:55 EST 2004


Guys,

>> 3) 744992 
>> 
>> Alas, the bug as identified by Arnar Birgisson is still there.
>> As any solution to this will affect core dblibrary results processing,
>> I'd rather give it a thorough workover.
>> Can I have a couple of days to work on this ? 

>Naturally.  We'll just make it part of 0.64, if that's OK by you.  

Alas,

This is probably more serious than I previously thought. It's come about from 
a dblib patch I submitted a while ago  (dblib v 1.170 - v1.171). It would 
mean a client program wouldn't get told about *any* empty result set that was 
returned from within a stored procedure call. Although none of the unit tests 
trap this condition, I for one couldn't use dblibrary in it's current state.

Fortunately, I have a patch for this, which I'll submit tomorrow. Although it 
does rework dbresults() quite significantly, it makes the processing much 
easier to understand and I have tested it pretty thoroughly. 

Sorry guys, but better late than after a formal release I guess.

Bill




More information about the FreeTDS mailing list