[freetds] Status 0.62rc4

Castellano, Nicholas Nicholas_Castellano at acml.com
Thu Jan 8 09:22:04 EST 2004


> From: Lowden, James K 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:51 PM
> 
> I won't hold up 0.62 for the failures Bill cites.  One he 
> said is "poorly designed", and the other two aren't show 
> stoppers according to Frediano, who wrote them.  

I know Freddy said he was going to disable the flags test.  If the others
aren't important they should be disabled too, otherwise bad PR is likely to
result ("The FreeTDS team ships releases that don't even pass their own
regression tests...")

Cheers,
--nick
-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Please note that we do not accept account orders and/or instructions by e-mail, and therefore will not be responsible for carrying out such orders and/or instructions.





More information about the FreeTDS mailing list