[freetds] Using sp_executesql with Microsoft SQL Server 2000

Frediano Ziglio freddyz77 at tin.it
Wed Jul 2 19:34:53 EDT 2003


Il mer, 2003-07-02 alle 20:18, Rogers, Tom ha scritto:
> Yes, it is worth our while.  I have on my to-do list to get the latest drop
> from CVS and test.  We already have a simple test case.  Just haven't had
> the time to do the download, build, test.  
> 
> Will provide more info when available.
> 
> THANKS!
> 
> Thomas Rogers
> System Engineer
> Concurrent Computer Corporation

News:
- Today I tested ODBC/RPC stuff :)
- I encountered some problem :(
- I'm doing some fix :) ...

freddy77


> > phone: 215.712.7422 x7261
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lowden, James K [mailto:LowdenJK at bernstein.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:18 PM
> To: 'FreeTDS Development Group'
> Subject: RE: [freetds] Using sp_executesql with Microsoft SQL Server
> 2000
> 
> 
> > From: Rogers, Tom [mailto:tom.rogers at ccur.com]
> > Sent: July 2, 2003 9:55 AM
> > 
> > So, then will this or won't this work with UnixODBC and the 
> > escape query format?  
> 
> I don't know, Tom.  I doubt it.  I hope the ODBC folks will answer you
> definitively, and that someone will contribute a unit test.  
> 
> > I am not sure of the interaction with UnixODBC, and
> > FreeTDS, other than that when we built FreeTDS we instructed 
> > it that we were using UnixODBC.  
> 
> AIUI, the driver manager is a thin layer over the ODBC driver, whose main
> purpose is to isolate the various driver configuration idiosyncrasies from
> the application.  
> 
> > I guess if the new RPC stuff is used transparently and
> > automatically at a low enough level, it would just "start to 
> > work" under UnixODBC, but I don't know if that is the case.
> 
> That's our goal.  
>  
> > I think you are saying it won't work????
> 
> If "it" is output parameters in prepared ODBC statements, then, I'm afraid
> it only almost works.  I'm happy to be corrected.  
> 
> Is it worth your while to put together a unit test?  That would answer the
> question, and if the answer is "no, still broken", we'd at least have a
> baseline measure.  
> 
> --jkl
> 
> -----------------------------------------
> The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
> confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s)
> named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any
> review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
> original message. Please note that we do not accept account orders and/or
> instructions by e-mail, and therefore will not be responsible for carrying
> out such orders and/or instructions.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
-- 
Frediano Ziglio <freddyz77 at tin.it>



More information about the FreeTDS mailing list