Odd problem round 2.
James Cameron
cameron at stl.dec.com
Tue Jan 2 21:58:45 EST 2001
Brian! Do we do bit fields properly?
Tim Uckun wrote:
> OK I tried it with each field by itself and it segfaults on the "done]
> [bit] NULL" field.
This is terribly significant.
> All other fields pull in fine. I tried with a couple of other tables
> and the same story. If the select statement returns a bit field AND
> any of the bit fields contains a 1 or 0 then it segfaults.
Well, bit fields tend to only contain 1 or 0.
> It returns a 104 error message for each row in the query which
> contains a bit field that is not null.
I think this is just FreeTDS not implementing bit fields. But I haven't
checked. Perhaps those with intimate knowledge of the code could
comment?
Tim: I suggest you CONVERT the bit fields to something else.
--
James Cameron (james.cameron at compaq.com)
http://quozl.linux.org.au/ (or) http://quozl.netrek.org/
More information about the FreeTDS
mailing list