[Commons-research] research agenda

Giorgos Cheliotis gcheliotis.lists at gmail.com
Fri Jul 4 07:52:50 EDT 2008


Kim, we did consider your proposal already, only problem is that the  
program is already crammed with people wanting to present their own  
relevant research work (which is a good thing!), and if you add to  
that all the other isummit keynotes and events there wasn't enough  
time left to do what you proposed. I do hope that bits of appreciative  
research dialogue will take place during speedgeeking, the final  
discussion session and any other self-organized meetings that  
participants may arrange on the side (see also my reply to Alek's post).


On Jun 29, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Kim Tucker wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> Perhaps consider something like this suggestion:
>
> http://wiki.icommons.org/index.php? 
> title=Appreciative_Research_Dialogue
>
> I am willing to facilitate.
>
> K
>
> ------
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been thinking about our workshop's program and in particular  
> about
> ways of discussing future research agenda. I think this is an  
> important
> issue - to collectively agree on what subjects / methods are useful  
> and
> should be pursued.
>
> I know there is a discussion session planned for this, but a) it is
> relatively short and b) it's at the end of the workshop.
>
> I think it would make sense to have earlier meetings in smaller  
> groups,
> for instance dealing with specific research fields (economy, social
> sciences, law, and so on). These groups could form positions on
> particular agendas in these fields - and then present them in the last
> session.
>
> I think this would help to end the workshop with precise views on  
> future
> actions.
>
> Best,
>
> Alek
>
>
> -- 
> This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and  
> conditions, e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document  
> Format (ODF) standard.
> The full disclaimer details can be found at http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html 
> .
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by  
> MailScanner,
> and is believed to be clean.  MailScanner thanks Transtec Computers  
> for their support.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-research mailing list
> Commons-research at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-research




More information about the Commons-research mailing list