[cc-licenses] Clarification for Non-Derivative License: grayscale from color not a derivative work

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Thu Jan 5 15:35:07 EST 2012


On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Sarah Pearson <sarah at creativecommons.org> wrote:
> The way the licenses currently work, the question of what constitutes a
> derivative/adaptation is determined by reference to local law. This is the
> case for purposes of BY-SA and BY-ND. Currently, the only exception is for
> synching, which is explicitly deemed an adaptation for purposes of the
> license.

So the part about "a work that constitutes a Collective Work will not
be considered a Derivative Work for the purpose of this License" is
meaningless?


More information about the cc-licenses mailing list