[cc-licenses] 912 emails about DRM
invernomuto at paranoici.org
Sat Apr 21 11:00:39 EDT 2012
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:58:29 +0100 Rob Myers wrote:
> On 04/18/2012 06:28 PM, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Exactly, and I think the case of digital works is especially
> > illuminating, since there's no source availability requirement in
> > current CC-by-sa: as a consequence, one can distribute a
> > CC-by-sa-licensed digital work in a format that really hampers
> > modifications, without being compelled to make source code (== the
> > preferred form for making modifications) available in parallel.
> Once can, but unlike with DRM one cannot have people fined or imprisoned
> if they decide they are going to do the work of translating the work to
> a more useful format.
This is certainly true.
Indeed, I have already acknowledged that DRM is worse than source
> Essentially, if we don't object to DRM
But I *do* object to DRM, as I have previously stated.
I just want to make sure that we fight against DRM with Free
restrictions, rather than with non-free restrictions.
Otherwise, the cure is worse than the disease.
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/attachments/20120421/751520a7/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the cc-licenses