[cc-licenses] Aggregation and Stronger SA
invernomuto at paranoici.org
Mon Apr 16 13:02:51 EDT 2012
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:09:42 -0400 drew Roberts wrote:
> I say make all parts of the aggregation Free. All parts to not have to be
> copyleft or under the same copyleft license. Just under some acceptable (i.e.
> truly) Free license.
I think this is really unworkable: what is a "truly Free license"?
For instance, I personally consider the GNU GPL v2 as a recommendable
license, while I consider the CC-by-sa-v3.0 as a non-free license.
Your opinions may significantly differ. The opinions of other people
will sure differ.
The only way a copyleft mechanism may actually work is that, when it
kicks in, it mandates the adoption of the *same* license (or, at most,
a limited set of alternative licenses, if explicit conversion clauses
are in place).
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/attachments/20120416/8faa10c6/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the cc-licenses