[cc-licenses] derivatives and source
zotz at 100jamz.com
zotz at 100jamz.com
Sun Apr 8 14:50:23 EDT 2012
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 23:42:48 +0200, Francesco Poli
<invernomuto at paranoici.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:18:30 +0200 adam wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 07/04/12 04:52, Mike Linksvayer wrote:
>>
> [...]
>> > If I were adam I'd want some form of one-way BY
>> > and BY-SA compatibility with GPL rather than adding source
>> > requirements to CC licenses.
> [...]
>
> I am already asking for a one-way conversion clause from CC-by-sa to
> GPL and from CC-by to zlib.
No. Please. Not if we get proper copyleft protection into BY-SA this
round for things like photos and images in video etc. I don't think the
GPL provides this protection and why would we want to negate the
improvements that we may achieve in BY-SA going forward by letting the
works slip out into the GPL where they will lose that protection? Now,
if the next GPL follows the lead of BY-SA going forwards and gives equal
protection, I am ***ALL*** for joining the silos as this is the one
painful weakness/problem with strong copyleft versions of Free licenses.
all the best,
drew
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list