[cc-licenses] short-form of licenses allowed ?
Mike Linksvayer
ml at creativecommons.org
Sat May 5 15:46:57 EDT 2007
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 19:55 +0530, shirish wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm using CC licensing in all my correspondence. Now the
> signature can't be very big as I also want to have my PGP signature
> underneath. So it is ok to have it in the way I have it atm or is
> there some shorter way I can use. Please guide.
> --
> Shirish Agarwal
> This work is licensed under the CCNSP 1.0 License. To view a copy of
> this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/nc-sampling
> +/1.0/
Yes, CC licenses explicitly allow for giving notice with the a license
URL rather than a copy of the license.
As a practical matter I wouldn't use "CCNSP" as an abbreviation. AFAIK
nobody has ever used that, so it would not really convey any
information.
Shorter version:
This email is licensed under
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/nc-sampling+/1.0/
Also, I'm not sure why you would want to use this license for email.
Attribution-NonCommercial has very similar characteristics, is much more
widely used, and in my experience is more easily understood. URL for
the current version is http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Note that I am not a lawyer, etc. :)
--
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:Mike_Linksvayer
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list