[cc-licenses] is the cc-gpl text licensed?
adam at xs4all.nl
Tue Jul 17 00:20:01 EDT 2007
actually, I would rather not use the trademark, so it looks like all is
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 15:59 -0700, Dana Powers wrote:
> CC does not assert copyright in the text of its licenses. However,
> you should review the trademark policy which may prohibit you from
> associating the Creative Commons' name with modified versions of the
> See http://creativecommons.org/policies/
> On 7/16/07, adam hyde <adam at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > hi,
> > are the wrapper texts under:
> > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/GPL/2.0/
> > licensed? I ask because I would like to take these templates and change
> > the wording so it is useful for applying to documentation.
> > adam
> > --
> > adam hyde
> > 'free as in media'
> > ~/.nl
> > http://www.flossmanuals.net
> > http://www.simpel.cc
> > http://www.radioqualia.net
> > _______________________________________________
> > cc-licenses mailing list
> > cc-licenses at lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
'free as in media'
More information about the cc-licenses