[cc-licenses] Question about BY and SA licenses
evan at prodromou.name
Sat Jan 20 19:48:10 EST 2007
On Sat, 2007-20-01 at 13:51 -0500, James Grimmelmann wrote:
> >>> and reworked it, would providing the attribution in metadata form be
> >>> good enough to satisfy the requirement of the license?
> And, in response to the original question, note that "Image by XXX"
> alone does not fulfill the attribution requirements, which also require
> providing (or linking to) the CC license, giving the title of the work,
> and if practical, giving the URI that the original creator specified.
...and a note on the changes that were made, if the image is "reworked".
And any copyright notices, if they exist.
Something like this:
Image "Minnesota Sunset" by Augie Q. Author, cropped to show
only the cow, available under the Creative Commons Attribution
2.5 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ ). See
http://augie.example.com/sunset for more information.
Evan Prodromou <evan at prodromou.name>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/attachments/20070120/7fbd446c/attachment.bin
More information about the cc-licenses