[cc-licenses] multiple licenses of same image
zotz at 100jamz.com
Tue Jan 16 18:47:33 EST 2007
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 05:59 pm, Mike Linksvayer wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 17:52 -0500, drew Roberts wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 January 2007 02:17 pm, Mike Linksvayer wrote:
> > > There is no such thing as "upsampling" so this logic cannot apply to
> > > versions of a work at higher resolution than offered.
> > Surely I can take a 1024X768 picture, double its dimensions and them
> > massage the result to not be as pixelated.
I would not get the original work, but I would get a work at the original
resolution which IIRC, some were talking about.
> > I think this may be what people mean by upsampling.
> I think you've discovered a NEW COMPRESSION ALGORITHM! Drop everything
> and post to Slashdot.
You think? With my fairly low user number I might just get modded insightful
if someone is in a rush! Well, perhaps funny then.
I know what you meant, and certainly in the general case, and the ones we are
concerned about, your meaning is correct. I was just pointing out that people
might be using the term in a different way than you were saying was
all the best,
(da idea man)
National Novel Writing Month
Sayings (Winner 2006)
More information about the cc-licenses