[cc-licenses] Version 3.0 -- It's Happening & With BY-SA CompatibilityLanguageToo

Mia Garlick mia at creativecommons.org
Mon Feb 19 15:25:07 EST 2007


thanks for these dana.  the edits have been incorporated.

On Feb 15, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Dana Powers wrote:

> Why are we debating the merits of the Non-Commercial restriction
> again?  I fear this thread has drifted dreadfully off-course.
>
> It seems like everyone is comfortable with the "including without
> limitation" issue as it is (something CC will consider, but not
> necessarily the only thing).  Was there anything else major that needs
> to be resolved?  Mia said she wanted to get this out by tomorrow, so
> let's try to be as concise, constructive, and efficient as possible so
> we can make that happen.
>
> Here are some minor grammatical fixes (in **):
>
> on page 4, clause 4(b), sentence 3:
> "If you license the Derivative Work under the terms *of* any of the  
> licenses
> mentioned in (i), (ii) or (iii) (the "Applicable License")..."
>
> Perhaps for clarity/style (same sentence):
> "...you must comply *both* with the terms of the Applicable License
> generally and *with* the following provisions:"
>
> deeper in 4(b):
> "(II) You may not offer or impose any terms
> on the Derivative Works that restrict the terms of the Applicable  
> License
> or the ability of a recipient of the Work to *exercise the* rights  
> granted
> under the Applicable License;"
>
> All the best,
> Dana
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses




More information about the cc-licenses mailing list