[cc-licenses] Version 3.0 -- It's Happening & With BY-SA CompatibilityLanguageToo
Mia Garlick
mia at creativecommons.org
Thu Feb 15 17:33:11 EST 2007
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:31 PM, Jonathon Blake wrote:
>
[cut]
> I don't think many people have thought about the implications of "NC",
> especially as laid out in the guidelines of what Creative Commons says
> it means. [Which I noticed today have changed since I last looked
> them on the wiki, six or so months ago.]
>
really? how have they changed?
> xan
>
> jonathon
> --
> OOo can not correct for incompetence in creating documents from MSO.
> Furthermore,OOo can not compensate for the defective and flawed
> security measures used by Microsoft. As such, before using this
> product
> for exams that require faulty and defective software, ensure that you
> will not be unjustly penalized for the incompetence of the
> organization
> that requires the use of software that is known to be flawed,
> defective, bug-ridden, and fails to meet ISO file format standards.
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list