[cc-licenses] Version 3.0 — It's Happening & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too

Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell at gmail.com
Mon Feb 12 18:52:00 EST 2007


On 2/12/07, drew Roberts <zotz at 100jamz.com> wrote:
> My take is that CC should not list a license as compatible unless it is
> reciprocal.

Why would someone bother making a license compatible then? Why not
simply make the new license an exact duplicate of the compatible cc
license?  Doing so could only reduce the number of failure modes.



More information about the cc-licenses mailing list