[cc-licenses] Free as in Gru
Peter Brink
peter.brink at brinkdata.se
Sat Apr 28 03:18:19 EDT 2007
Greg London skrev:
>
> What are you talking about? Of course a CC license transfers
> some rights. Just not the rights that someone like
> ASCAP would purchase.
>
You don't really understand how a copyright license works do you? A
license _does not_ transfer any copyrights. The word transfer has a
specific legal meaning. It means a full transfer of ownership of an
object from one entity to another. A copyright license "leases" some of
the powers the licensor owns to the licensee. The licensor still owns
the copyright. This scenario can of course be more complex than this if
we are dealing with a chain of sub-licenses.
An open source/open content license however does not let the licensee
lease parts of a copyright. Such licenses _lends_ a part of the
licensor's copyright to the licensees. This is however not an
unconditional loan, it comes with some terms and conditions.
A right is something I can demand. If I borrow something I cannot demand
to be allowed to do what the owner will not let me do. I have no real
rights. An source/open content license makes a licensee free to use a
copyrightable object in ways he might not have done otherwise.
To me the use of "freedom" in this context is fully accurate.
/Peter Brink
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list