[cc-licenses] Is "podsafe" music affected by CRB rulings
jblake at eskimo.com
Sun Apr 8 00:58:26 EDT 2007
Kevin Phillips (home) wrote:
> Yes, sorry.....see I need that clever license chooser thingy we invented
> earlier ;)
Before you grab that hat, reconsider your position.
> read "if Your public digital performance is primarily intended for or
> directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation."
Undefined phrase "primarily intended".
Does your day job see an increase in revenue because of your podcast?
If so, then your private stream can be defined as being "primarly
intended for ... private monetary compensation."
That might seem extreme, but if your "day job" is in the music industry,
then the demonstrating that it was intended as "commercial" is trivial.
More information about the cc-licenses