[cc-licenses] Clarification needed regarding collective works & derivative works in the context of podcasts / dj mixes
Mike Linksvayer
ml at creativecommons.org
Tue Sep 19 20:09:00 EDT 2006
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 12:46 +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Mike Linksvayer schrieb:
> > Here's what http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Podcasting_Legal_Guide says:
> > [...]
> [...] I also think that a musician choosing
> "noderivs" as part of their license is mostly concerned with preventing
> sampling and "bootleg"-remixes and not so much any of it appearing in a
> DJ set (after all, especially electronic dance music is, if anything,
> made *for* being part of a DJ set), the license and all explanatory
> documents I have found so far do leave me in a bit of a limbo.
You could always just use tracks released under licenses that explicitly
allow derivatives. And perhaps urge musicians who release under (I'm
guessing) BY-NC-ND to switch to BY-NC. What kind of musician who is
enlightened enough to use CC at all would find _noncommercial_
derivatives abhorrent? Whoever they are, maybe you shouldn't include
them in your sets. :)
IANAL, etc.
--
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:Mike_Linksvayer
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list