[cc-licenses] ParaDist Questions
ml at creativecommons.org
Wed Nov 29 17:26:03 EST 2006
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 14:41 -0500, James Grimmelmann wrote:
> This is all a long way of explaining why I don't share Mike's confidence
> that the anti-TPM clause isn't implicated by the greeting cards and snow
Tentative assumption rather than confidence, but your explanation has
mostly persuaded me.
So assuming an digital artifact without digital out is effectively TPM,
and assuming no parallel distribution, would it be possible for an
electronic greeting card to comply with a CC license? By making very
clear that lack of digital out is not a matter of TPM but of expense,
e.g., documenting the chip's pinout?
More information about the cc-licenses